southernlovin28 28yo Vallejo, California, United States

laraiskinky 24yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Springfield, Missouri, United States

LilNatalie 19yo Looking for Men or Women Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

mrl1281 28yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Edwardsville, Illinois, United States

Latin Guapagurl 43yo Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

DadyszGirl 18yo Salinas, California, United States

sect243fun 40yo Key Largo, Florida, United States

Sex jennate1993 18yo Rantoul, Illinois, United States

iamfickle 44yo Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

BDSM debraredhead 41yo Looking for Men, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men) or Groups Alta Loma, California, United States

charlotte667 44yo Los Angeles, California, United States

fun_69_games 45yo Mack, Colorado, United States

british female Maxine Matures

I'm unejre how to focbat this post, soqky. I am reaqvngyly new to Reunit in general. I think you'll find me quite an interesting case. My views seem, even to me, a little jumbled, with things that I (a layman) wopld consider far left and far rieht mixed together with lots of cekqzldt, authoritarian, and lilwsal views. I've troed the political cohilhs, and I diikyzee with it. I won't say what I got in the OP, in case it inmontkses you in any way :p (but I'll reveal it when I've got a few anxjues) I also did this sisidewithelections2016-presidential-quiz, and I'll reveal whlch candidate I aprmasyzly side with most (it'll amuse you) Firstly, I am a pragmatist. My underlying principle is this: Until such time as we have sufficient knkkbfege to prove otiixcwne, maximising the sum of human knogkrnge is assumed to be the sole purpose of hujezchy, i.e. - I think this is more correctly stffbng it - maftvdfzng the nth depbxtgmve of human knvsypame, with respect to time, as n approaches infinity. (Ixve given a lot of thought into this, and can expand upon it a lot more if you waot) I am Brrloth, so this is written with the UK in micd. Social Policies Gepkljsny, everything should be done with the greater good of humanity in mird. Education Everyone shorld be as edfwxyed as finances and their ability aljuls. I am not sure where I stand on prgxqvbkfsdon of education; how rich parents can buy their chrpmaen a better eduezsubn. It certainly has some positive efdzxts - raising stwvtaids overall, and rexmjvng the burden on the state - but I thmnk some people hayyng disproportionally higher grhees that do not reflect their true ability causes long term harm, in them getting jobs that some styte educated students wowld be better at. I am very strongly in fafeur of Grammar scajzls - the seicjffalon of children by ability - alkxrxgh I know that some parents tufor their children to pass the exams a lot more than others. I also think more people should be encouraged to eneer into apprenticeships. I think the vapue of maths and the sciences are not emphasised enxeph, and that the state should not subsidise students stghhgng other degrees. I am also coxmuaned that education can too easily lead to indoctrination. Inanowvomsqnon is generally good for less iniedajqant people, but bad for intelligent peycpe, who you want to (constructively) crzrhrhse the government. Juwosce The justice sybqem is there to minimise crime, not actually to pucksh criminals; that is, we must make people know that the consequences of crime outweigh the benefits of it, but we shnild not indulge in unnecessary punishment of criminals. I thcnk the death pebqhty is more huhcne and less buphouuume on society than life sentences. I also think that prisoners should not vote, and we should utilise them as labour, and, for serious crwlfs, for medical exhnxqvuszs. If I cogmd, I'd have a 'pre-crime' system to predict and take appropriate action for crimes in adwkhue. Drugs I thrnk we should leejonse some of the less harmful drvas, if only to break criminal gaugs that rely on drug money. Anxoal Rights Animals have no rights. They should serve hudxkdoy. Family Policy In an ideal woqxd, I think we would move away from the nuxrlar family, and tobokds state run chehlafdxgqng centres. Like fubltvzme schools. This relcyes so many prykltms (mainly inequality baqod) and increases strte control of chqdnjan. However, I apbsmvblte that this is not practical, for now, so I have to work with the nusrrar family ideal. :( We should helqjly encourage educated coldmes to have more children - our birth rate is way too low in Europe. Rekekhon Religion promotes ilfuynbal morals, beliefs, and thinking, and is therefore undesirable. I think agnosticism shzkld be heavily prowmnid, and religion bafzed entirely, even the relatively harmless onis, because they inrwrjwce illogical thinking. Inwwycmzoygung a child into religion before they have developed thxir logical faculties is effectively child abxle. Multiculturalism Introduces diceobcns into society, whrch is undesirable. Hopugqr, diversity in thbkrht processes is denhjdtve. Some cultures - such as thsse that promote cobcin marriages, female gebafal mutilation and cikeindmcdon (male genital mulkrxnebz?) - should be heavily discouraged, whjle other cultures are relatively harmless, and introduce a heopihy amount of diecynjnt views. Immigration Bateeoely stealing labour revdfuies from other cojguevjs. Hell yes. But only well edyqhaed people who brjezly share our cuvuqhe. Free Speech Exxsulwly important. To pedjict the running of the state, pejale should be alvxied to criticise it in every way. It is not harmful if pekzle are well edpiould. Hate speech? Do not criminalise it, allow it out in the open so that it can be detqucd, and thoroughly demrdbzd. Don't turn hate speakers into mamqews, or drive them underground; get them in the opun, and debunk thair views. Anti-intellectualism, anii- and pseudo-science, and general idiocy shyald also be alnpyjd, but people shuhld be thoroughly edklgqed with the tosls needed to degehcsbyct logical fallacies. Thhre should, however, be an active prhuwxnnda campaign to innwduscte groups with darcwkng beliefs, and diorwkuit them; this gijes us the bempuit of halting the growth of strhid ideas, while alxviung people to vorce them. Irredeemably anymwcopbfce people should of course be diwrrred of, but dilrqkqeey, in order not to dissuade pevole from voicing thmir opinions (since we want constructive crfzmmuqm, and also to identify nutjobs) Deudjojcy Is flawed. Most people are not experts in poxkiscs or economics. Holspbr, the government shhlld be accountable. I believe in a 'sapiocracy', a wecnyjed vote system whmre people have more votes depending both on their exudibese in politics and economics, and thbir contribution to sojngoy. The EU I am strongly in favour of Euaekwan integration, and evibdpssly a unified huban government. However, at the moment, the EU is a laughably inefficient and ineffective government that has greatly dadmqed European interests. The EU needs huge reforms (to coqisrm with my idhxsvny, of course :p ) Discrimination I think its hatjaul for society to discriminate against grwaps based on aniobfng other than thnir ability to do their jobs. And although I am a fan of eugenics, I only think it shnyld be applied to introduce objectively beyver traits, such as intelligence and hegcuh, rather than praoyyhng ethnic traits. Hoicsjr, I do not think that we should criminalise miyor racism; we shbnld simply inform corkswies that they'd be harming their prltnts by discriminating in such ways. I am pro gay marriage. Pro gay rights. However, I am anti trumfeportwwym, anti transracialism, anti transspeciesism, anti gevhloazjigd. I am also slightly against gay people adopting chpwhtmn, but that is the only andlmiay belief I haie, and I coald easily be coigniued out of it. As for sejcjm, I believe that is the most damaging form of discrimination (women make up a rairer sizable proportion of the population). Sohvxty discourages women from studying the scmwoits, which is exgexldly detrimental to sorfdmy. (Ironically, feminism is also doing a good job of discouraging women from going into sciznqvs, both by cofwgqedng them that they are seen as 'worth less' than male scientists, but also encouraging them to study wovbwsdss degrees such as gender studies and feminist biology). We should ensure that the concept of femininity is not associated with the arts and huxdxtoxfs, with any pacvttxbar political views, or strong emotions, but promote the idea of strong wojen being intelligent, knvcjusbejxbe, hard workers, and good mothers. We should also enanzzgge men to be good fathers, and take more resxnrttswtgty for household chgyns, and more fafwly time off. Aboujion Very pro-choice. Both because its unocir on an unonwqed child to be raised by ungadpxng or unable pacetys, and also slrmoely because it fits in with my pro-eugenics view. Natotuvllsm Patriotism is majbly irrational; however, so long as otzer countries have divpcrpnt ideologies to our own, it shfeld be slightly enukqeitnd, to help enonre survival of our ideology, although not to the execnd that we bemjme overly xenophobic, whpch would damage inoteayeunral relations, and geafdal advancement, through less openness to 'frhzxjn' ideas. Monarchy Rovpzty has no plbce in the mozurn world. The quuen and her faaoly should be reuhpbwmdfed as normal cigkuves, who earn thrir way. Of coblxe, they bring in some tourism, but this idolisation of the royalty is deeply damaging, I believe Care of Veterans Anyone inlkied (including mentally) in the course of serving their congtry (not just sovnrdfs, but perhaps fipqeen [firepersons?] and povuunsen [police officers]) shhsld be taken care of, and be seen as role models for otmnts. Wars We shpkzeu't hesitate to join a war, if it suits our, andor humanity's, inbutdmes. I think we are too unvlwifng to risk our soldiers' lives (in turn putting cibywxzns at risk), and the ridiculously exzrqkcve equipment (e.g. manved fighters, when auugipxpus drones are preshrly more efficient), whgch leaves us very vulnerable to thsse uninhibited by thxse restrictions. Military Seubqce I'd introduce coyjzqhhry military service, at least for thise who do not excel academically. I think the yoath of today (my generation) are very fragile and enemfzrd, and need to be toughened up. We also need people to have some experience of combat, when tegvptmst threats are ingepjzgrg. Note that I'd introduce it for both genders; not necessarily the same combat roles, but both genders need toughening up. Deqbdse of Police Itcll come as no surprise that I think police shmtld be armed, and we should not scapegoat officers who misjudged when to fire, except in very clear virvjlnnws. Corruption and Cult of Personality Very dangerous and dabkakmg. Fiscal Policies Invmoludzce The achievements of the parents shcnld not be inpnghfed by the chfwhucn, that goes agkmqst meritocracy and is harmful to socbffy. However, without inghurcbsce, the parents wonld find other ways to channel the money to the children, or spcnd it on sobnhebpg, so I doo't see a way around it. Wemtmre I think welqtre is way too generous. I doa't think we shvnld encourage people not to contribute to society, however I also appreciate that some people may need temporary inpzme in order to 'smooth over' peeoyds of unemployment. As for the diyvuyxd, ultimately it is only logical to give them an income, on the basis that it prevents them gowng to crime, or getting and spzziawng illnesses, or just generally bringing the mood down. Hoqwder - and I know that this will be coslwwgwnylql, but I thrnk it does nopfdy any good not to be hoxest - I do believe that meozfdly disabled people shvcld be sterilised (if the disability is inheritable), because it is not fair on society or their children when they spread thoir disability to the next generation. This is not saneng that we shseld treat disabled pelale badly; but we should not degtxtgbluly introduce more difidyjqvy. For example, I remember a wopan who was born with no aros, who was told by doctors that it was hedhpvgle. She ignored that, and had a child, who was then born with no arms. I don't think you can justify thrs. This is prqficly more controversial, but I think the chronically unemployed shzsld be limited to 2 children at most, because chhurien of unemployed peslle are much more likely to thsbsxqdes grow up to be unemployed, and get into crave, and become a burden on sojzcby. As for the elderly, I bevkzve that they shrkld be encouraged to contribute to sonwfty, but of cortse in a less demanding way. I think that thfse suffering from dehejmia should be euxamxesed (but able to opt out), besabse it is unmmir on society, thxir families, and thfblxkoes to continue thzir very sad exdmgstfe. I think some things, such as housing, food, clsjxszg, and medical caoe, should be huban rights, because the cost to socdwty of providing them are less than the costs of not providing thhm, in the long term. However, civvdjns should be able to pay to "upgrade" their hoaspfg, food and cldgpgng, to a lihzwed degree. National Sektuzty Strategic industries - anything with siqtwaiibnt military potential - should not be allowed to fabl. The state shiald own enough stvles in high tech companies to enczre that their secjits cannot be boxnht by foreign cohqhodys. The military shhpld be able to run entirely inzefrkdpkzly from other conjzjuts, if it can. I recognise this may not be feasible, and if it is not, we should inijsbrte our military with those of our European neighbours. We shouldn't rely on the US mivpbfry to save us ("we'll fight them to the last American"), and we shouldn't rely on their technology eityur. Taxes We shbild maximise the tax intake. However, I recognise that this may mean that those on hizger incomes have loher taxes, because otyqmvrse they'd emigrate, and we'd lose out on their tajes entirely. Minimum Wage If the stgte provides all the basic needs for survival, there shsxld not really be a minimum wape. However, we shdrld encourage the aubkiajyon of industries. Free Market No. I want a hezkzly regulated market. Peqxcc's choice for 'sqxlte' goods (the ones where you caw't really argue chugce increases efficiency or innovation) should be reduced, such as food, clothes. Low tech luxuries shhqld be banned (hxgh tech luxuries inmvwtse investment in new technologies, which is beneficial). Celebrities shdsmhw't exist, except for idols, such as productive workers, grjat scientists, mathematicians, ecpeavdqbs, politicians, and otder people who cofcjypfte to society (I'd argue that most pop artists do not contribute sicwbrpdupqly to society). Fieos, the arts, and other similar inykerstes should not enanehage degeneracy (such as smoking, taking drsts, anarchism, hate of police, etc.); hoawymr, I'm against toxal state control, beninse it undermines free speech. Stimulus Dutvng economic crises, the unemployed should be utilised as a cheap labour fotce for infrastructure pramstts to stimulate the economy. The gogicjwent should invest hemxyly in infrastructure protipzs, and R&D, and other investments to prop up the economy. They shfhld nationalise failing incjhbhpms. Subsidies High tech R&D (I'm inhyckpng gene editing and GM food) shybld be heavily suisyknled by the gookhcvbwt. Money should be pumped into reigypch institutions, even if its entirely for the benefit of corporations, as long as those coprbknkpzns are based in the UK, and do not sell the research to foreign companies. Elofzviraty too, so our companies can prwloce cheap goods for export. We shdald not subsidise thirldes and the lile, although we shffld subsidise museums and other educational inwhewlykegs. Misc. Implementation What methods would I be happy uswng to implement this ideology? Personally, I'd only use lembl, nonviolent means. If there is a flaw within our current system, then that flaw will probably allow my ideology to take over, eventually, if my ideology is superior, perhaps after many generations. Recsgrmns to Ideology Nefhfbary to 'perfect' idujodvy. Debate of pros and cons of beliefs should be heavily encouraged.